Archive for May, 2009

Auditory perception

May 22, 2009

Auditory perception

Background

Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) commonly report an increased awareness of environmental sounds, abnormal loudness perception, and difficulty in filtering or “hearing out” the important auditory information in background noise.

Auditory sensory phenomena have been associated with ASD since autism was first identified in 1943. Recent studies from a UK clinical database indicate that these phenomena may be present in over 60% of individuals with ASD. Difficulties with auditory perception are clinically prominent and can be disabling especially for children, who may become distressed and unable to understand speech in a noisy classroom environment, and therefore find themselves at an educational and social disadvantage to their peers.

Although individuals with ASD and their carers frequently report auditory perception problems, they have received relatively little attention by researchers recently, especially with a view to identifying the possible underlying mechanisms. This is especially true of studies on the perception of speech in adverse acoustic environments, such as classrooms or playgrounds.

Speech-in-noise perception

We recently compared the speech communication abilities of a group of individuals with ASD and age/IQ-matched control participants, who listened to sentences presented in different types of background noises. Specifically, the signal-to-noise ratio required for 50% speech intelligibility, known as the speech reception threshold (SRT), was measured for both groups in five background noise conditions and two noise level conditions. Individuals with ASD were found to be significantly poorer at identifying key words in the sentences than the control participants, especially for background noises that contained spectral and/or amplitude modulations (i.e. frequency or temporal “dips”). In other words, they were not as good as the control participants at selectively listening for the target speech in frequency and/or temporal dips present in the background noise, a process that is sometimes called “dip listening”. The size of the SRT difference measured was between 2-4 dB, which though not numerically large, is perceptually significant and may result in as much as a 40-60% change in speech perception performance.

Frequency selectivity and temporal processing

Frequency selectivity refers to our ability to separate or “hear out” the frequency components in a complex sound, and to improve the speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). Temporal resolution refers to the ability to detect rapid changes in acoustic stimuli with time, and is a very important dimension in speech perception since speech sounds fluctuate over time, and much of the information is carried in the changes themselves. We are testing the idea that these two processes, that underlie dip listening ability, might be abnormal in ASD and might be the basis of the poorer-than-normal speech-in-noise perception abilities.

Significance

The studies underway will result in advances in the understanding of ASD by: (1) increasing the knowledge of the pathophysiology associated with autism, by specifying the mechanisms that underlie auditory processing disorders; (2) extending the current psychological theories that address the perceptual and attentional aspects of autism, by determining whether enhanced perceptual discrimination abilities underlie the local processing bias observed in ASD; and (3) establishing the importance of sensory processing in ASD, leading to a better understanding of the communication abilities of individuals with autism.

————————————————————————————————————————————-

These are the reasons for me not to  choose sound and animation. Instead do  it plain and and clean as it will be open to those who can tolerate sound and visual stimulus to the ones they can not do it.

Visual attention

May 14, 2009

Important information to take into consideration for the game.

http://www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/lara/projects/vis-atten.html#visual-search

Visual attention

Background

There are many reports of differences in visual attention in autism compared to typical individuals, both experimentally and anecdotally. One frequent observation is that individuals with autism can focus excessively on certain stimuli in their environment, and that these stimuli can seem quite irrelevant to typical individuals. Another common observation is that individuals with autism show acute attention to fine detail. However, it is also frequently reported that individuals with autism can be highly distractible.

Attention to detail

Perhaps the most influential finding which highlighted the excessive attention to detail as a research question was the initial studies showing that children with autism can perform better than typical individuals on the Embedded Figures task. This requires picking out a small stimulus from a surrounding context. One possible reason for this ability that we have explored is that individuals with autism are better able to discriminate the small figure from other similar figures in the surrounding background. In order to investigate this further, we gave children with and without autism a series of visual search tasks, which required participants to search for a conjunctive target amongst distracters. We also varied how similar the target was to the distracters, and found that children with autism showed superior performance, even when the target and distracters were highly similar.

Top down attentional control

We have also used computerised visual attention tasks to assess whether the way in which information is presented can affect selective attention in children with autism. We have found that the amount of irrelevant information presented on a computer screen affects selection of relevant information in the same way for both typical children and children with autism. We have also found that like typical children, children with autism are more distracted by task irrelevant information that shares features with their current goals. These findings suggest that selective attention can be quite typical in children with autism. However, further studies have shown that selective attention performance can depend on the type of information presented.

Stimulus specific attentional differences

We have found that children with autism show typical attentional modulation of static information, but have difficulty with modulating dynamic information. For example, we found that both typical children and children with autism were more distracted by irrelevant colour distracters (static stimuli) when colour formed part of their current goals compared to when it did not. Typical children showed the same pattern for abrupt onset distracters (dynamic stimuli) whilst children with autism did not. Children with autism were only slightly distracted by stimuli with an abrupt onset, even when abrupt onset formed part of their current goals. We are currently investigating if this results from perceptual or attentional differences.

Final choices

May 6, 2009

Untitled-1 copy

Final choices though still can be improved but so far it  is going well.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.